rightdoor.blogg.se - Does micropore tape help scars

#DOES MICROPORE TAPE HELP SCARS SERIAL#
#DOES MICROPORE TAPE HELP SCARS SKIN#
#DOES MICROPORE TAPE HELP SCARS TRIAL#

Safe to use, dressings are a noninvasive way to soften and flatten keloids.

#DOES MICROPORE TAPE HELP SCARS SKIN#

Rarely side effects can include skin discoloration, acne, headache, vision problems, fatigue, or a serious allergic reaction.

8ĭressings that contain steroids (e.g., Cordran® tape) are typically linked to only minor side effects such as skin irritation, burning sensation, and itchiness that tend to go away in a few days. 17įor nonsteroidal dressings only minor adverse side effects such as bacterial infection can typically be avoided with changing dressing as appropriate and keeping the area clean.

Product must be removed and reapplied daily so the keloid or wound site can be cleaned.

Silicone gel, cream, spray, and foam 17, 21.

17 Some indicate that 6-12 months may be necessary to be effective. Most experts suggest 2-3 months of use with a minimum of 12 hours each day. May also be in gel form that solidifies over wound. Products are self-adhesive and applied directly to keloid site. Cordran® can also be used in combination with compression therapy. Dermatologists caution that using Cordran® for a long time may cause the skin to thin out too much in some people, but this is due to the steroids (not the tape). Consistent with other such dressings, Cordran® can help alleviate itchiness too. 3, 20Ĭordran® tape combines a strong topical steroid with surgical tape, applying a consistent dose of the medication with an occlusive dressing. Studies show that dressings that are partially to totally air and water-tight (occlusive) as well as hydrating can help with healing new wounds and decreasing the symptoms of scar tissue (e.g., itchiness and pain).

#DOES MICROPORE TAPE HELP SCARS SERIAL#

Indian J Plast Surg 38(2):175–179ĭaya M, Nair V (2008) Traction assisted dermatogenesis by serial intermittent skin tape application.Flatten Keloid Scars With Surgical Tape & Wound Dressings Meenakshi J, Jayaram V, Ramakrishnan KM, Babu M (2005) Keloid and hypertrophic scars: a review. Meyer M, McGrouther DA (1991) A study relating wound tension to scar morphology in the presternal scar using Langer’s technique. Burns 25(3):207–213Īarabi S, Bhatt KA, Shi Y, Paterno J (2007) Mechanical load initiates hypertrophic scar formation through decreased cellular apoptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(3):1108–1122ĭavey RB, Sprod RT, Neild TO (1999) Computerised colour: a technique for the assessment of burn scar hypertrophy. Van Zuijlen PPM, Angeles AP, Kreis RW, Bos KE (2005) Scar assessment tools: implications for current research. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(2):560–571Ĭhang P, Laubenthal KN, Lewis RW (1995) Prospective, randomized study of efficacy of pressure garment therapy in patients with burns. Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, Richard Hobbs FD (2002) International clinical recommendations on scar management.

#DOES MICROPORE TAPE HELP SCARS TRIAL#

J Plast Reconstr Surg 96(7):1715–1718Ītkinson JA, McKenna KT, Barnett AG, McGrath DJ, Rudd M (2005) A randomized, controlled trial to determine the efficacy of paper tape in preventing hypertrophic scar formation in surgical incisions that traverse Langer’s skin tension lines. Reiffel RS (1995) Prevention of hypertrophic scars by long-term paper tape application. Its use should be extended to managing established keloids and hypertrophic scars. Specific scar taping is able to enhance the maturation of the scar and manage the related symptoms. Photographic scoring demonstrated a high rate of decrease in scar redness, flattening and a decrease in the surface shine. An improvement was seen in 28 scars ( n = 40). Scar quality: this remained the same in 12 scars. All other 27 scars had a score reduction ( n = 32). Itch score: the baseline itch score was 0 in four scars and an increase of 1 point seen in one scar. All other 28 scars had a score reduction ( n = 32). Pain score: the baseline pain score was 0 in three scars and remained unchanged at 10 for one scar. Twenty-five scars had no change ( n = 42). Scar surface area: eight scars (19%) had a decrease with a range of 3–50% and an average of 19%.

Scar thickness: 29 (69%) scars demonstrated a decrease with a range of 20–75% and an average of 39% ( n = 42). Both objective and subjective parameters were measured. The patient's scars were taped in a specific manner. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with a total of 42 abnormal scars were entered in a prospective trial. Our aim was to measure the effects of the micropore taping on abnormal scars. In the literature, the use of occlusive taping is prophylactic. Multiple modalities of treatment exist for the control of abnormal scars and their associated symptoms.